ETHNOPOETICS.ORG : a collaboration to extend the valuing and study of global poetries

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
omnipoetics:discourse_between_walt_whitman_and_pedro_mir [2025/03/26 21:18] – joshuaomnipoetics:discourse_between_walt_whitman_and_pedro_mir [2025/04/24 00:41] (current) – admin
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== Map of the America's: A Hemispheric Juxtaposition between The United States and the Caribbean (120-3) ======+====== A Map of the Americas: A Hemispheric Juxtaposition between The United States and the Caribbean (120-3) ======
  
 Whitman declares: "The United States themselves are essentially the greatest poem" (112). Can the United States simultaneously exist as a poem and nation? How does this metaphor emphasizes unity, structure, and grapple with the vision of the United States, a singular state that happens to be composed of many nations. In other words, what are the implications of imagining a country really be a poem?  Whitman declares: "The United States themselves are essentially the greatest poem" (112). Can the United States simultaneously exist as a poem and nation? How does this metaphor emphasizes unity, structure, and grapple with the vision of the United States, a singular state that happens to be composed of many nations. In other words, what are the implications of imagining a country really be a poem? 
Line 150: Line 150:
  
 Which is pretty neat if you ask me. Rothenberg thinks so to, or at least his critical framing brings down this subtle linguistic shift in structure, ""Whitman's spirit can only be redeemed by a new pronoun, the //we// of all those nations and people that have been //othered//" (123). I'm not sure if Whitman's //spirit// needs to be redeemed. But the juxtaposition between poets places the readers in a new literary geography composed in the service of omnipoetics.  Which is pretty neat if you ask me. Rothenberg thinks so to, or at least his critical framing brings down this subtle linguistic shift in structure, ""Whitman's spirit can only be redeemed by a new pronoun, the //we// of all those nations and people that have been //othered//" (123). I'm not sure if Whitman's //spirit// needs to be redeemed. But the juxtaposition between poets places the readers in a new literary geography composed in the service of omnipoetics. 
 +
 +
 +{{tag>English USA poem lyric(poem) Race_Culture_Identity Walt_Whitman Original}}
  
Navigation

Current:

Alcheringa:

Print/export
QR Code
QR Code omnipoetics:discourse_between_walt_whitman_and_pedro_mir (generated for current page)