Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| omnipoetics:jung [2025/03/05 22:47] – [Collective Unconscious] mahrukh | omnipoetics:jung [2025/03/05 23:25] (current) – [Works Cited] mahrukh | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| {{ : | {{ : | ||
| The collective unconscious refers to the collective universal patterns, symbols, and archetypes that shared across all of humanity. The universal archetypes present in the collective unconscious manifest themselves through dreams, myths, legends, and storytelling. These manifestations reflect the deeper universal unconscious that connects humans together, regardless of personal experience. In the process of individuation, | The collective unconscious refers to the collective universal patterns, symbols, and archetypes that shared across all of humanity. The universal archetypes present in the collective unconscious manifest themselves through dreams, myths, legends, and storytelling. These manifestations reflect the deeper universal unconscious that connects humans together, regardless of personal experience. In the process of individuation, | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | |||
| + | " | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| This theory of collective unconscious emerged through an extended process of self-experimentation, | This theory of collective unconscious emerged through an extended process of self-experimentation, | ||
| Line 25: | Line 31: | ||
| In Jung's own exploration of Individuation and the realization of the Self, he utilized the mandala to reach psychic wholeness. The realization of the self typically follows these steps: assimilation of the shadow (dark side of ego that is repressed and rejected by the ego) to acknowledge the deficiencies in our personality, | In Jung's own exploration of Individuation and the realization of the Self, he utilized the mandala to reach psychic wholeness. The realization of the self typically follows these steps: assimilation of the shadow (dark side of ego that is repressed and rejected by the ego) to acknowledge the deficiencies in our personality, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Shadow ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Upon entering the inner reality or subconscious level of the individuation path, one encounters the shadow. But the dilemma is, the shadow does not reveal itself unless it has gone through the cycle of understanding. For instance, if one says that 'I am selfish and that is my shadow' | ||
| ==== Anima/ | ==== Anima/ | ||
| Jung believed that the Anima/ | Jung believed that the Anima/ | ||
| - | ===== Trickster Figure | + | ===== On the Psychology of the Trickster Figure |
| Jung's Trickster archetype represents the contradictory forces present within the psyche, and embodies the destructive and creative sides of human nature. As a symbol of the unconscious, | Jung's Trickster archetype represents the contradictory forces present within the psyche, and embodies the destructive and creative sides of human nature. As a symbol of the unconscious, | ||
| Line 37: | Line 47: | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| In order to become whole, one must learn how to accept the trickster, the shadow self that lies within the individual' | In order to become whole, one must learn how to accept the trickster, the shadow self that lies within the individual' | ||
| + | |||
| + | In his article, Jung traces the trickster archetype emerging in different medieval carnivals and festivals - at times allowed and other times banned - by religious or governing authorities. Yet, he argues, that the trickster cycle (proposed by Radin) is recurrent. By cycle, he compares it to different figures in myths such as spirit Mercurius, who goes through a process of foolish mistakes and becomes a laughing stock, then realization dawns on him, he learns, and becomes wiser. Repeatedly, Jung relates the trickster figure to that of the shadow archetype in psychology, which has most similarities (unconsciousness) but also a few differences (" | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Jung's Critique ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | In Paul Radin' | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | "...No greater distortion of the actual facts could possibly be imagined. And yet Dr. Jung obtained this example from what purported to be a first-hand account, and similar examples often fill reputable descriptions of a tribe. They all illustrate the unconscious bias that lies at the bottom of our judgement of primitive mentality, the unconscious assumption of the lack of differentiation and of integration to be found there. We know that this lack of stability and integration is a basic assumption in all evolutionary theories of cultural development. This is, however, emphatically not the case with Jung and others who take his attitude toward primitive mentality. Some other explanation must be sought. What makes for error in our interpretation is a certain mistiness of vision due to that sentimentality from which the northern European finds it so difficult to free himself" | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Radin later ties Jung to the laymen viewpoint again, | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | "The prevalent view to-day among laymen is that they are at all times the plaything of their passions, and that self-control and poise are utterly alien to their character, if not, indeed, quite beyond their reach. We have seen in fact that even so open-minded and sympathetic a scholar as Jung apparently still accepts this view (cf. page 39)" (63). | ||
| + | </ | ||
| In Rothenberg' | In Rothenberg' | ||
| Line 42: | Line 70: | ||
| ==== Works Cited ==== | ==== Works Cited ==== | ||
| - | C. G. Jung, and Joan Chodorow. Jung on Active Imagination. Princeton University Press, 1997. EBSCOhost, research.ebsco.com/ | + | Jung, C.G. and Joan Chodorow. Jung on Active Imagination. Princeton University Press, 1997. EBSCOhost, research.ebsco.com/ |
| + | |||
| + | Jung, C.G. The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious. Second ed., Princeton University Press, 1969. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Jung, Carl Gustav (2009). Shamdasani, Sonu (ed.). The Red Book: Liber Novus. Translated by Kyburz, Mark; Peck, John; Shamdasani, Sonu. | ||
| Fordham, Frieda, and Michael S.M. Fordham. “Character of His Psychotherapy.” Encyclopædia Britannica, Encyclopædia Britannica, inc., 7 Feb. 2025, www.britannica.com/ | Fordham, Frieda, and Michael S.M. Fordham. “Character of His Psychotherapy.” Encyclopædia Britannica, Encyclopædia Britannica, inc., 7 Feb. 2025, www.britannica.com/ | ||
| - | “International Association for Analytical Psychology.” International Association of Analytical Psychology IAAP, iaap.org/ | + | “International Association for Analytical Psychology.” International Association of Analytical Psychology IAAP, iaap.org/ |
| + | Accessed 5 Mar. 2025. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Radin, Paul. Primitive Man as Philosopher. D. Appleton and Company, 1927. | ||
| Rothenberg, Jerome. Revolution of the Word; a New Gathering of American Avant Garde Poetry, 1914-1945. Seabury Press, 2000. | Rothenberg, Jerome. Revolution of the Word; a New Gathering of American Avant Garde Poetry, 1914-1945. Seabury Press, 2000. | ||
| “Steps of the Individuation Process.” Steps of the Individuation Process, CarlJung.net, | “Steps of the Individuation Process.” Steps of the Individuation Process, CarlJung.net, | ||