ETHNOPOETICS.ORG : a collaboration to extend the valuing and study of global poetries

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
omnipoetics:lord [2025/02/19 00:31] – [Connection to Nahuatl Authorship] adrianaomnipoetics:lord [2025/02/19 01:02] (current) – [Connection to Nahuatl Authorship] adriana
Line 48: Line 48:
 </blockquote> </blockquote>
  
-There are two ways to explore Nahuatl poetry through this lens. The poet was the singer and the composer, so if the //Cantares Mexicanos// uses a specific performance by a specific singer, than that is what is meant by authorship, as the quote above with Lord. The poet is creating the song and is authoring it anew with each performance. From León-Portilla's perspective, there is enough information historically, in the text, and the glossary notes to say that the specific words captured were ones said during a specific performance, i.e. making them the 'author'.  +There are two ways to explore Nahuatl poetry through this lens. The poet was the singer and the composer, so if the //Cantares Mexicanos// uses a specific performance by a specific singer, than that is what is meant by authorship, as the quote above with Lord. The poet is creating the song and is authoring it anew with each performance. From León-Portilla's perspective in //Fifteen poets of the Aztec World//, there is enough information historically, in the text, and the glossary notes to say that the specific words captured were ones said during a specific performance, i.e. making that specific person the 'author'. The idea of authorship does not fit with the concept of oral tradition. Lord tries to bridge that gap by saying, "From that point of view a song has no 'author,' but a multiplicity of authors, each singing being a creation, each singing having its own single 'author'" (102).  
 + 
 +//The following is opinion//: 
 + 
 +This is further complicated by the fact that performances often had multiple singers. The idea of authorship seems to have implanted itself in a tradition that is far removed from the preoccupations of ownership. The singers were receiving the flowers and songs from heaven during collaborative ceremonies, and yet, the modern critic still attempts to introduce the individual into the mix. The individualistic perspective does not align with the circular view and the collectively made works. While Lord argues that each performance is an author, I would go further and say that there is no author and there does not need to be one. The beauty of the poetry, even as removed as it is, does not come from knowing which specific poet we are attributing the song to. In fact, I believe that placing the idea of authorship into the reader's head, sets them up from the beginning to misunderstand the culture, purpose, and tradition of oral poetry. To put authorship on Nahuatl poetry is like trying to explain the way we think of time to someone in Hopi. Just like there are no words for past, present, and future in Hopi, a square peg does not fit into a round hole.  
 ===== Works Cited ===== ===== Works Cited =====
  
Navigation

Current:

Alcheringa:

Print/export
QR Code
QR Code omnipoetics:lord (generated for current page)